TL;DR: SOC 2 report examples
- A SOC 2 report is an independent CPA attestation that evaluates an organization’s controls against the AICPA’s Trust Services Criteria.
- SOC 2 Type II reports assess how effectively controls operate over a defined audit period.
- Every report includes management’s assertion, the auditor’s opinion, the system description, and control testing results.
- Understanding these sections helps you evaluate an organization’s security posture and audit scope.
- Scytale is a leading AI GRC platform that automates evidence collection and continuous compliance, helping organizations achieve and maintain SOC 2 compliance.
A SOC 2 report is one of the first documents customers request when evaluating a software or service provider. It provides an independent assessment of an organization’s security controls, helping customers determine whether the company can be trusted to protect sensitive data.
Whether you’re preparing for your own audit or reviewing a vendor’s report, understanding how to read a SOC 2 report is essential. In this article, we’ll explore what a SOC 2 report is, how it’s structured, what each section contains, and how to interpret the auditor’s opinion and findings.
What is a SOC 2 report?
A SOC 2 report is an independent attestation issued by a licensed CPA that evaluates whether your organization has designed and operated effective controls to protect customer data.
It provides customers, prospects, and partners with evidence that your security and compliance practices meet the AICPA’s Trust Services Criteria. There are two types of SOC 2 reports. A SOC 2 Type I report assesses whether your controls are suitably designed at a single point in time. A SOC 2 Type II report goes a step further, evaluating how effectively those controls operated over a defined period, typically between three and twelve months. Because it demonstrates consistent control performance over time, a Type II report is generally considered the gold standard.
At the end of a successful SOC 2 Type II audit, you’ll receive your report, which serves as evidence that your organization maintained effective controls throughout the audit period. It covers the applicable Trust Services Criteria included within the scope of the audit. Before exploring the report itself, it’s helpful to understand the five Trust Services Criteria that form the foundation of every SOC 2 assessment.
The five Trust Service categories
The Trust Services Criteria (TSC) are the set of requirements developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) to evaluate how service organizations protect customer data. They define the internal controls an organization should have in place and form the foundation of every SOC 2 audit.
The five Trust Services Criteria are:
| Trust Services Criterion | Focus | Example |
| Security | Protects systems and data | Access controls, MFA |
| Availability | Keeps systems available | Uptime, disaster recovery |
| Processing Integrity | Ensures accurate processing | Data validation |
| Confidentiality | Protects sensitive data | Encryption, access restrictions |
| Privacy | Protects personal information | Consent, data retention |
Every SOC 2 audit includes Security as a mandatory criterion, while the remaining four are optional and selected based on your organization’s services, systems, and customer requirements.
During the audit, an independent CPA evaluates the design and, for a Type II audit, the operating effectiveness of your controls against the applicable Trust Services Criteria. Their findings are documented in your SOC 2 report, along with an opinion on whether your controls meet the required standards.
Because your SOC 2 report is often shared with customers, prospects, and partners as evidence of your security and compliance program, it’s important to understand what it contains and how to interpret each section. Next, we’ll break down the key components of a SOC 2 report and explain what each one means.
How is a SOC 2 type II report structured?
While every SOC 2 Type II report is slightly different, most follow the same standard structure defined by the AICPA. Each section serves a specific purpose, from describing your organization’s systems and controls to documenting the auditor’s findings and opinion. Understanding this structure makes it much easier to interpret a report, whether you’re reviewing your own or evaluating a vendor’s.
A typical SOC 2 Type II report begins with a cover page outlining the audit scope, reporting period, applicable Trust Services Criteria, and any relevant disclaimers or limitations. It is then organized into the following SOC 2 sections:
- Management’s Assertion: Management’s statement confirming the report accurately represents the organization’s systems and controls.
- Independent Service Auditor’s Opinion: The auditor’s opinion on whether the controls were suitably designed and operated effectively.
- System Description: A detailed overview of the systems, services, and controls included in the audit scope.
- Description of Controls and Test Results: A summary of each control, how it was tested, and the auditor’s findings.
- Management’s Response to Exceptions (optional): Management’s explanation or remediation plan for any exceptions identified during the audit.
Get SOC 2 Compliant 90% Faster
SOC 2 report sections explained
A SOC 2 Type II report is designed to give customers, partners, and stakeholders confidence in your security controls. While the document can be lengthy, each section has a clear purpose. Here’s what you’ll find in every part of a typical SOC 2 report.
Section I: Management’s assertion
The report begins with management’s formal assertion that the information presented is accurate, complete, and fairly represents the organization’s systems and controls. It also confirms that the controls were designed to meet the applicable Trust Services Criteria and, for a Type II audit, operated effectively throughout the reporting period.
Think of this as management’s official declaration: “These are the systems we use, these are the controls we’ve implemented, and this report accurately reflects how they operated during the audit period.”
Section II: Independent service auditor’s opinion
This is the auditor’s independent assessment of your organization’s controls and one of the most closely reviewed sections of the report. Here, the CPA evaluates whether the controls were appropriately designed and, for a Type II report, whether they operated effectively throughout the audit period.
The auditor will issue one of four opinions:
- Unqualified opinion: Controls are suitably designed and operated effectively. This is the desired outcome.
- Qualified opinion: One or more control deficiencies were identified that do not invalidate the entire report.
- Disclaimer of opinion: The auditor could not obtain sufficient evidence to form an opinion, often due to scope limitations.
- Adverse opinion: Significant control deficiencies prevent the organization from meeting the applicable Trust Services Criteria.
Section III: System description
This section provides a detailed overview of the systems included within the scope of the audit. It helps readers understand how the organization delivers its services, protects customer data, and manages risk.
The system description typically includes:
- Services provided by the organization
- System components, including infrastructure, software, people, procedures, and data
- Service commitments and system requirements
- Applicable Trust Services Criteria
- Complementary User Entity Controls (CUECs)
- Complementary Subservice Organization Controls (CSOCs)
- Relevant system incidents during the audit period
- Significant changes to the system or controls
- Areas outside the organization’s responsibility or audit scope
For many customers, this is one of the most valuable sections because it explains exactly what was evaluated during the audit. AI for SOC 2 can simplify this process by automatically mapping controls, systems, and evidence to the audit scope.
Section IV: Description of controls and test results
This is the most detailed section of the report. It lists each control that was audited, explains how the auditor tested it, and documents the results of those tests.
For every control, you’ll typically see:
- The control description
- The audit procedures performed
- The auditor’s test results
Rather than explaining how every control is implemented internally, this section focuses on whether the control functioned as intended. For example, it may state that user access reviews are performed quarterly and confirm that the auditor verified those reviews occurred during the reporting period. Many organizations use SOC 2 platforms to automate evidence collection and monitor controls, making it easier to demonstrate operating effectiveness during an audit.
Section V (Optional): Management’s response to exceptions
If the auditor identifies exceptions or issues, management may choose to include a response in this optional section. It allows the organization to provide additional context, explain remediation efforts, or clarify circumstances surrounding the findings.
Organizations may also use this section to share information that falls outside the audit scope, such as future system improvements or planned security initiatives to strengthen SOC 2 compliance. Because this content is provided by management, it is not audited or covered by the auditor’s opinion.
Understanding these sections makes it much easier to evaluate a SOC 2 report, whether you’re reviewing your own audit results or assessing a vendor’s security posture. A well-structured report with a clean auditor opinion demonstrates that an organization has implemented and maintained effective controls.
Streamline SOC 2 reporting with Scytale
Scytale’s AI GRC platform and expert GRC team help organizations simplify every stage of the SOC 2 journey, from audit readiness to achieving a successful SOC 2 audit. By automating evidence collection, continuously monitoring controls, and centralizing compliance activities, Scytale reduces manual work and keeps your audit documentation accurate and up to date.
With continuous compliance built into your day-to-day operations, your team is always prepared for customer security reviews, annual audits, and changing compliance requirements. The result is a smoother audit experience, a stronger SOC 2 report, and more time to focus on growing your business.
FAQs about SOC 2 report examples
What is a SOC 2 report?
A SOC 2 report is an independent attestation issued by a licensed CPA that evaluates whether an organization’s controls meet the AICPA’s Trust Services Criteria. It provides customers, prospects, and partners with assurance that the company has implemented effective controls to protect data and manage security risks.
What’s the difference between a SOC 2 Type I and Type II report?
A SOC 2 Type I report evaluates whether controls are suitably designed at a specific point in time. A SOC 2 Type II report assesses both the design and operating effectiveness of those controls over a defined audit period, typically between three and twelve months, making it the more comprehensive and widely requested report. Scytale’s AI GRC platform simplifies preparation for both audit types through automated evidence collection and continuous compliance.
What are the possible auditor opinions found in SOC 2 report examples?
There are four possible auditor opinions in a SOC 2 report. An unqualified opinion means the controls are suitably designed and operating effectively, which is the desired outcome. A qualified opinion indicates that one or more control deficiencies were identified, but they are not significant enough to invalidate the report. A disclaimer of opinion means the auditor could not obtain sufficient evidence to form an opinion, while an adverse opinion indicates that significant deficiencies prevent the organization from meeting the applicable Trust Services Criteria.
Who can see a company’s SOC 2 report?
SOC 2 reports are restricted-use documents and are typically shared only with authorized parties, such as existing customers, prospective customers under a nondisclosure agreement (NDA), business partners, investors, or regulators with a legitimate business need. They are generally not published publicly because they contain detailed information about an organization’s security controls.
Why does the System Description section matter so much in SOC 2 report examples?
The System Description section outlines exactly what was included in the audit, including the organization’s services, systems, controls, and audit scope. It helps readers understand what was evaluated, which Trust Services Criteria were assessed, and whether the report covers the areas most relevant to their security review. Top AI GRC platforms like Scytale help automate documentation and continuously map controls to your audit scope.
