Third-party risk management (TPRM) and vendor risk management (VRM) both help organizations manage risks created by external relationships, but they differ in their scope and application. Understanding the difference helps organizations build a risk management program that matches the scope and complexity of their third-party ecosystem.
What is Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM)?
Third-party risk management is the process of identifying, assessing, monitoring, and managing risks introduced by an organization’s third-party relationships.
Third parties can include vendors and suppliers, but the term may also cover contractors, consultants, service providers, business partners, affiliates, and other external organizations. These relationships can introduce cybersecurity, compliance, privacy, operational, financial, and reputational risks.
A typical TPRM process includes:
- Identifying and categorizing third parties based on their level of access and potential risk.
- Conducting due diligence and risk assessments before onboarding.
- Reviewing security controls, certifications, policies, and compliance documentation.
- Establishing contractual security and compliance requirements.
- Continuously monitoring and reassessing third parties as their services, access, or risk profile changes.
- Managing offboarding and ensuring access and data are handled appropriately.
A strong TPRM framework creates a consistent approach to these activities rather than treating each third-party relationship differently. Organizations can also use third-party risk management software to centralize assessments, documentation, risk tracking, and ongoing monitoring.
Streamline GRC workflows with no blind spots.
What is Vendor Risk Management (VRM)?
Vendor risk management is the process of identifying and managing risks specifically associated with vendors and suppliers that provide products or services to an organization.
For example, a cloud hosting provider, payroll platform, or CRM provider may introduce security or compliance risks through its access to systems and data. VRM provides ongoing oversight of these risks throughout the vendor lifecycle.
The vendor risk management process commonly includes vendor due diligence, security questionnaires, risk assessments, contract reviews, vendor categorization, ongoing monitoring, periodic reassessments, and offboarding.
The goal is not to eliminate vendor risk entirely. Instead, organizations need enough visibility to understand which vendors create the greatest exposure, whether appropriate safeguards are in place, and when additional remediation or monitoring is required.
AI-native GRC for how teams work today.
Key differences between TPRM and VRM
While TPRM and VRM share similar goals and processes, they differ in several important ways. Here are the key differences between TPRM and VRM:
Scope
The biggest difference is scope. VRM focuses on companies that provide products or services, while TPRM covers a broader range of external relationships, including partners, contractors, consultants, and affiliates.
Program structure
VRM typically follows the vendor lifecycle, from selection and onboarding through ongoing oversight and offboarding. TPRM takes a wider view, managing risk across the organization’s entire third-party ecosystem.
Organizational ownership
VRM is often managed by procurement, security, and compliance teams, while TPRM may involve broader coordination across legal, IT, finance, and other business functions. This reflects the wider range of relationships and risks covered by TPRM.
How they work together
Both approaches use similar risk management practices, including assessments, due diligence, monitoring, and remediation. In practice, VRM often operates as a component of a broader TPRM program.
Which approach does your organization need?
The right approach depends on the complexity of your external relationships. Organizations mainly managing suppliers and service providers may find a vendor risk management program sufficient.
Businesses with a broader network of partners, contractors, consultants, and other external parties may benefit from a wider TPRM framework to ensure risks outside the traditional vendor ecosystem are also covered.
A centralized risk management platform can help organizations manage both approaches by providing consistent oversight and scaling with the complexity of third-party relationships.
