penetration testing vs. compliance audits: what's the difference?

Penetration Testing vs. Compliance Audits: What’s the Difference?

Beni Benditkis

Penetration Testing Manager

Linkedin

When it comes to keeping your business secure and meeting regulatory requirements, two big concepts often pop up: penetration testing and compliance audits. Both are essential, but they’re not the same thing. You can think of them as different tools in your information security toolkit – each with its own purpose, focus, and results. 

Let’s dive into what sets these key terms apart, why your business needs both, and how to understand the world of pen testing and compliance audit requirements without turning gray at the thought.

Penetration Testing Explained

Imagine you hire someone to try to break into your business – not physically, but digitally. That’s essentially what penetration testing is (aka “pen testing”). Simply put, these ethical hackers’ core purpose is to exploit your vulnerabilities before the bad guys do. The goal? To identify vulnerabilities in your systems, applications, or network so you can fix them before an actual cyberattack occurs.

Why Do You Need It?

Cybercriminals are at the top of their game and they know just how to find those sweet spots. Unfortunately, your business’s information security is only as strong as its weakest link, so whether it’s a misconfigured firewall, outdated software, or a simple human error, vulnerabilities can happen. Meeting penetration testing requirements often forms part of staying compliant with key industry standards like SOC 2 or PCI DSS. Beyond compliance, it simply makes good business sense. Who wouldn’t want a sneak peek into how hackers think and how they might attempt to attack your business?

Types of Penetration Testing

Pen testing isn’t a one-size-fits-all deal. Depending on your business’s unique needs and what you’re hoping to achieve, you might choose to go for one (or more) of the following:

  • Black Box Testing: Testers simulate an external hacker’s attack without prior knowledge of the system, mimicking real-world infiltration attempts.
  • White Box Testing: Testers have full access to the system’s architecture and code, allowing a thorough search for any vulnerabilities.
  • Gray Box Testing: Testers work with partial system knowledge, combining external and internal attack perspectives to identify hidden flaws.
  • Automated Penetration Testing: Uses tools to quickly simulate attacks at scale, ideal for identifying known vulnerabilities before a more thorough manual test.

Each type has a different focus, but the mission remains the same: identify weak spots, fix them, and make sure your business remains secure.

What are Compliance Audits?

If penetration testing is like hiring a hacker to test your defenses against security threats, then a compliance audit is like inviting an official inspector to verify whether you’re playing by the rules. Sounds intimidating, right? Compliance audits are, however, essential as they evaluate whether your organization meets specific standards, regulations, or frameworks – ranging from SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA to GDPR, PCI DSS, DORA, and more.

What’s the Goal?

The goal of a compliance audit is to ensure that your business adheres to the regulatory and industry standards required to operate in your sector, regardless of whether you’re in healthcare or finance. Auditors evaluate your policies, procedures, and systems to confirm that you’re checking all the necessary boxes. A compliance audit isn’t designed to find vulnerabilities (that’s the purpose of penetration testing); however, it’s necessary for proving that your business is fulfilling regulatory and industry-specific obligations.

Penetration Testing vs. Compliance Audits: The Key Differences

Here’s the deal: penetration testing and compliance audits are common terms thrown around in the context of security compliance but they aren’t interchangeable. They do, however, complement each other which is why both are valuable in our books.

Let’s break down the key differences so you can gain a better understanding of what these two terms mean and exactly how they differ:

FeaturePenetration TestingCompliance Audits
PurposeIdentify and fix security vulnerabilitiesConfirm adherence to standards/regulations
ApproachOffensive (simulate attacks)Evaluative (review policies, systems, and controls)
FrequencyPeriodic or as neededScheduled (e.g., annual audits)
ScopeTechnical systems and applicationsPolicies, procedures, security and privacy controls, and overall system effectiveness
OutcomeActionable recommendations for security improvementsCertification or report confirming compliance
Penetration Testing vs. Compliance Audits

Simply put, penetration testing is all about how secure your business is, while compliance audits are about proving your business is secure (to regulators, partners, and customers).

Factors to Consider: Do You Need Both?

Short answer: Yes. Long answer: Here’s why.

Risk Management

Penetration testing and compliance audits serve different but complementary purposes in managing your organization’s risks. Penetration testing is designed to evaluate your business’s resilience against potential security threats, identifying weaknesses that could be exploited by malicious actors. 

Compliance audits, on the other hand, ensure that you’ve implemented proper controls as per the regulatory and industry standards your organization is required to follow. Together, they create a solid foundation for your security strategy by addressing both technical vulnerabilities and the procedures involved to ensure compliance.

Regulatory Requirements

Most regulatory standards and frameworks, such as PCI DSS, explicitly require penetration testing as part of their compliance criteria. If your business aims to not only achieve but maintain compliance with these frameworks, penetration testing isn’t an option – it’s mandatory. Compliance audits assess whether these requirements are being met, making them essential for demonstrating your organization’s commitment to protecting customer data and meeting industry regulations.

Reputation and Trust

In the competitive SaaS landscape, customers and partners need assurance that your business takes information security seriously to earn their trust. Compliance audits provide this assurance by showcasing that your business adheres to key standards and regulations. Penetration tests further help boost this trust by showing that your defenses have been actively tested and validated by professional pen testers, so the risk of a major data breach occurring, for example, is significantly reduced. Together, these measures prove that your organization prioritizes security and takes a proactive approach to addressing potential risks. Not to mention that proof of compliance audits (including confirmation of regular penetration testing) is also often requested directly by customers and prospects, or through security questionnaires sent by them.

Continuous Improvement

A compliance audit offers a snapshot of whether your organization is adhering to security standards at a specific point in time. On the other hand, penetration testing is an ongoing process. Regular penetration testing provides invaluable insights, allowing your organization to continuously monitor and fine-tune its security measures over time. This approach helps your business make sure its security posture evolves to handle new threats and challenges, keeping your business ahead of potential attackers.

Penetration testing and compliance audits not only complement one another but also play essential roles in building a comprehensive security strategy. Combined, they help establish trust, meet tough industry standards and regulatory requirements, and drive continuous improvement in your organization’s overall security framework.

GET COMPLIANT 90% FASTER

Real-Life Examples: When to Use Each

Scenario 1: Preparing for SOC 2 Compliance

Your business is gearing up for a SOC 2 audit. Part of meeting the compliance audit requirements involves showing you’ve performed a pen test audit to assess your security controls. Penetration testing identifies the vulnerabilities, and your compliance audit verifies you’ve taken action to mitigate them.

Scenario 2: Achieving PCI DSS Compliance

PCI DSS compliance mandates regular penetration testing to secure cardholder data environments. So, before your compliance audit, you’ll need to check off the penetration testing requirements to ensure your infrastructure meets the expected security standards.

The Perfect Duo

Penetration testing and compliance audits are like two sides of the same information security coin – you need both to create a secure, compliant, and trustworthy business environment. To recap: penetration testing identifies vulnerabilities and provides actionable insights for fixing them, whereas compliance audits ensure your organization aligns with regulatory and industry standards.

By combining these two approaches, you’re not only staying ahead of security threats but also proving to key stakeholders that your business has its sh*# together when it comes to information security.

How Scytale Simplifies Compliance

Understanding complex terms like penetration testing vs. compliance audits and doing what it takes to become compliant doesn’t have to be stressful. Scytale’s compliance automation platform simplifies your compliance journey, helping you streamline the audit process with ease. Whether you’re working toward a SOC 2 report, ISO 27001 certification or any other framework, Scytale’s compliance software and dedicated team of compliance experts have got your back, making compliance one less thing to worry about.

Share this article

A CTO’s Roadmap to Security Compliance: Your Go-To Handbook for Attaining SOC 2 and ISO 27001

Security Compliance for CTOs